Chapter 10 discusses evaluation in instructional design and provides you with two evaluation models, the CIPP and Kirkpatrick models for evaluation. Search for at least two other models used for evaluation and summarize these models. Describe how you would use them to evaluate your instruction.
Another model for evaluation is the ADDIE method. ADDIE stands for Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation. This method is used to ensure that the evaluation phase is used in response to each of the other phase. Evaluation should not just be at the end of the process or lesson, but it should be throughout all of the phases. When using this method within the classroom, the instructor should ensure that the learner is actually meeting all of the standards and that the goal is actually being met.
Another model for evaluation is the ADDIE method. ADDIE stands for Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation. This method is used to ensure that the evaluation phase is used in response to each of the other phase. Evaluation should not just be at the end of the process or lesson, but it should be throughout all of the phases. When using this method within the classroom, the instructor should ensure that the learner is actually meeting all of the standards and that the goal is actually being met.
The Kemp model focuses on the learner’s perspective rather than the
content. The Kemp model consists of nine
elements in a circular motion. They are:
identifying the instructional problems and specify
goals, examine the learner characteristics, identify subject content and
analyze task components, state instructional objectives, sequence content,
design instructional strategies, plan and delivery of the instructional
message, develop evaluation, and selecting resources.
This model does not have a predetermined starting point; therefore, the
instructor can begin at any point. This main
focus of this model is that the learner’s needs and goals are the
strengths.
I feel some important questions would be “Are the students
learning what they should be learning?”, “Are the students going to be able to
transfer this knowledge to life situations?”, “Is this method easy to use?”, “Do
I have the technology or necessary resources to implement?”.
Chapter's 12 & 13 focus on project management and how to manage projects when resources are scarce. You have been assigned to develop a series of professional development sessions focusing on technology use in the classroom for teachers during a time of economic decline. How will you use Situational Leadership to facilitate this project and manage scarce resources?
In today’s world,
when technology is everywhere, we need to be teaching our students how to
effectively use technology. Unfortunately,
many districts are going through rough economic times and do not have the
resources to do this effectively. Scarcity
is when the demands exceed the supply. One
way many districts, including the one I am currently working in, are getting
around the lack of resources is implementing BYOD (Bring Your Own Device).
For professional development sessions, I would first find out what types of training the teachers would feel most beneficial. I would also use any technology that is already on the campus and train teachers how to use those resources. Many times there are resources already on campus, that either teachers do not know are there or do not know how to use properly.
By using the situational leadership approach, the first phase would be to instruct those teammates who are inexperienced or unsure. The second phase is where the team is still learning but gaining confidence. As the instructor, you are explaining, clarifying decisions, and rewarding improvements. The third phase is focusing on the results and rewarding your teammates for their improvements. The last phase is where you, as the instructor, steps back and monitors what the team has learned. The most important part of situational leadership is how you communicate with your teammates.
For professional development sessions, I would first find out what types of training the teachers would feel most beneficial. I would also use any technology that is already on the campus and train teachers how to use those resources. Many times there are resources already on campus, that either teachers do not know are there or do not know how to use properly.
By using the situational leadership approach, the first phase would be to instruct those teammates who are inexperienced or unsure. The second phase is where the team is still learning but gaining confidence. As the instructor, you are explaining, clarifying decisions, and rewarding improvements. The third phase is focusing on the results and rewarding your teammates for their improvements. The last phase is where you, as the instructor, steps back and monitors what the team has learned. The most important part of situational leadership is how you communicate with your teammates.
The ADDIE method is one of my favorite models. I believe that the evaluation process phase being used in response to each of the other phases makes it very effective. The ADDIE method not only helps to evaluate the student during the instruction, but the instruction can be evaluated also because you can see what’s working for the students and what’s not.
ReplyDeleteYou brought up some great questions that would be useful to know that instructional design evaluations do not normally address. Students’ being able to transfer the knowledge to real life situations is very important because learning should be meaningful for students.
I have not heard about BYOD (Bring Your Own Devise) being used in school districts. I would love to hear more about how that works. With the cutbacks in education it does make it very hard for the school districts to invest in technology and that’s a shame. Students are being raised in a tech savvy generation and it will only grow in the future so it’s important for students to have the tech knowledge to be able to complete in a tech savvy global society. You have a good project management plan that will help guide your team for a successful professional development sessions.
Melissa,
ReplyDeleteLike you, what I like about the ADDIE model is the constant evaluation that takes place throughout the learning and planning process. Assessment is not something that gets measured at the end of a lesson. Through summative and formative approaches the teacher is able to observe how the lesson is being received so automatic adjustments are possible.
As for the Kemp model, it seems exactly like the ADDIE model except with further steps in evaluating each process of analyzing, designing, developing, and implementing.
I like your question on how students can transfer the learning to real-life situations. The evaluation whether summative or formative should be measuring this. All learning should be applicable; lets be realistic the chances of our students going on to Who Wants to be a Millionaire or some other trivia show or close to zero. So we shouldn’t only be focusing on facts when teaching content but making it meaningful to the learner and applicable in the future.
When technology is being a dominant necessity of almost every career, scarcity in schools becomes a huge handicap. However, like you mentioned, there is so much technology and resources that are already available on campus but no one is trained to use so it just sits there. Before looking into what can ordered for classrooms all resources available need to be accounted for. If teachers are not using what they have they cannot argue for more. In the same light, if teachers are not being trained to use what they have then continued purchasing of resources is an absolute waste.
Personally, I do not like the idea of BYOD because if something is mishandled, broken, or stolen on campus, the campus is not held responsible. Replacement is no longer their problem. Unless the campus takes for responsibility for my device being used for instruction then I cannot risk being short of technology at work and at home.